Tallinn University of Technology
Institute
of Public
Administration

Innovation Policy and
Small States
General description of the specialisation
The second semester "Innovation Policy and Small States" specialization
deals with small states-specific socio-economic and institutional
aspects that determine the possibilities for different types (technical,
socio-economic, cultural etc.) of innovation and their level of
sophistication (radical, incremental), paving eventually the way for
economic growth and development. By following the examples Central and
Eastern European (CEE) countries, students will get an insight of
techno-economic capacity of these states. They will study the governance
and economic structure of these small states, which define the specific
context for the instruments to be used in order to achieve the
objectives of innovation policy. Thereby, by following comparative study
approach, the phenomenon of core periphery relations in Europe is
surveyed, and as a result, students are presented with the discussion
about the possibilities and obstacles for policy transfer, stemming from
the dichotomy between CEE small states and big powers of
Western Europe within the European Community due to
historical and cultural reasons.
The
specialization module for the ESST students consists of
three courses in the total
amount of 10 ECTS. These three courses would be introductory and
fundamental to assist students with articulating and developing their
research topic for masters` thesis development.
1)
“Master`s Seminar”
Obligatory: Yes
Number of credit points: 4 ECTS, 120 hours
Grade: Pass/Fail
Language of instruction: English
Content: The seminar operates as a classical
graduate seminar, where Master's students have to present their work on
their MA thesis. During the course students are expected to
engage in articulating work, in formulating research questions, in
designing a thesis proposal and writing a literature review. Students
are introduced with the research methods they mostly need to get
acquainted with to conduct their specific thesis work.
Bibliography (recommended):
Patrick O`Brien. Technology and World Economic History, London
School
of Economics.
Geoffrey Hodgson.
Institutional Economics,
University
of Hertfordshire.
Ha-Joon Chang. Institutions and Develpment, University of Cambridge.
Mario Pianta. Innovation and Employment, University of Urbino.
Franco Amatori. Technology and Structure in Alfred Chandler, Universita
Bocconi, Milan.
Leandro Burlamaqui. Competition Policies and Intellectual Property
Issues, Universidade Candido Mendes, Rio de Janeiro.
Gabriel Palma. The process of De-Industrialization, Cambridge University.
Richard Jolly. Poverty and Human Development, Institute for Development
Studies, University of Sussex.
Lars Mjoset. Technology and the Irish Development, University of Oslo.
Pekka Ylä-Anttila. Technology and the Finnish Development, ETLA, The
Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki.
Dirk Messner. China
and India in the
Global Economy, German Development Institute,
Bonn.
Lecturer(s): Professor Rainer Kattel
Educational methods:
Teaching consists of 6 seminars and a number of individual assignments.
Evaluation method:
Evaluation based on class participation and writing assignments.
2)
"Policy Skills: Strategic Management, Policy Analysis, and
Lesson-Drawing"
Obligatory: Yes
Number of credit points: 3 ECTS, 80 hours
Grade: Yes
Language of instruction: English
Content: Contemporary governments and policy makers often face
highly complex task of designing long-term strategic policies within the
framework of annual budget-making process that is necessarily geared
towards short-term political gains and goals. Innovation and technology
development are almost by definition policy areas were impact of
policies lies in a more or less distant future. In order to design in
such situation policies that perform well and actually attain desired
goals, policy analysis, lesson-drawing and strategic management,
public-private partnerships and procurement play key roles. This class
is designed to address the “how”, rather than the “what”, of successful
policy analysis and design, strategic management and lesson-drawing.
Bibliography:
Mintzberg, H. The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning, Harvard, 1994.
Schick, A. The Performing State Reflection on an Idea Whose Time Has
Come but Whose Implementation Has Not, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 2003,
Vol. 3 Issue 2.
Dolowitz, P. D and D. Marsh. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy
Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making, Governance 13(1), 2000.
Evans, M and J. Davies. Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level,
Multi-Disciplinary Perspective, Public Administration 77(2), 1999.
James, O and M. Lodge. The Limitation of „Policy Transfer“ and „Lesson
Drawing“ for Public Policy Research, Political Studies Review (1), 2003.
Van Thiel, S. Trends in the Public Sector. Why Politicians Prefer
Quasi-Autonomous Organizations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(2),
Sage Publications.
Pollitt, C and G. Bouckaert. Public Management Reform. A Comparative
Analysis. Second edition. Oxford University
Press, 2004.
Searle, R. J. What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics
(2005), 1: 1.
Cabral, L., Cozzi, G., Denicoló, V., Spagnolo, G. and Zanza, M. 2006.
Procuring Innovations. In: Dimitri, N., Piga, G. and Spagnolo, G. (eds).
Handbook of Procurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edler, J. and Georghiou, L. 2007. Public Procurement and Innovation:
Resurrecting the Demand Side. Research Policy, Vol. 36.
European Commission Expert Group. 2005. Public Procurement for Research
and Innovation: Developing Procurement Practices Favourable to R&D and
Innovation. Expert group report. EUR 21793 EN. Available at (16 December 2007):
http://europa.eu.int/invest-in-research/pdf/?report_public_procurement_research_innovation_en.pdf.
European Commission Working Group. 2006. Pre-Commercial Procurement of
Innovation: A Missing Link in the European Innovation Cycle. Working
Group Report. Available at (16 December 2007):
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/research/key_docs/documents/procurement.pdf.
Skelcher C (2005) 'Public-Private Partnerships and Hybridity' in Ferlie
E, Lynn L, and Pollitt C (eds.) Oxford
Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford
University
Press.
Bovaird, T. 2004. Public-private partnerships: from contested concepts
to prevalent practice International Review of Administrative Sciences.
Vol 70(2).
Brown, T.L., Potoski, M. and Van Slyke, D. 2006. Managing Public Service
Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets. Public
Administration Review, May/June.
Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Circular No A-76 (Revised).
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/circulars/a076/a76_rev2003.pdf
Pigou, A. C. Some Aspects of Welfare Economics. The American
Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 3. (June, 1951).
Hicks, J. R. The Foundations of Welfare Economics. The Economic Journal,
Vol. 49, No 196, (Dec., 1939).
Chang, H.-J., and P. Evans. The Role of Institutions in Economic Change.
Paper prepared for the meetings
of the „Other Canon“ group. Venice, Italy,
13-14 January, 2000.
Coase, R. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. The University of Chicago Press.
Chicago
and London,
1988.
Lecturer(s): Research fellow
Veiko Lember & Professor
Rainer Kattel
Educational methods:
This class is thought as a mixture of classical lectures and discussions
based on students homework that focus on various case studies related to
policy learning, transfer and management issues in economic and
innovation policy areas.
Evaluation method:
Evaluation is based on three homeworks (brief case studies that are also
discussed during the class) and final oral exam.
3)
"Small States"
Obligatory: Yes
Number of credit points: 3 ECTS, 80 hours
Grade: Yes
Language of instruction: English
Content: The course will provide an overview of the main issues
involved in development and administration of small states, which face
often different problems than larger states, both in terms of the nature
of problems (e.g. size of the market) and in potential solutions (e.g.
limited human capital).
Globalization and regionalization add new complex challenges to small
states. Innovation and industrial development often depend on long-term
and large-scale investments and growing markets, both lacking by nature
in small states. This implies special focus on innovation and industrial
policy context and its peculiarities with regard to innovation and
development potential of small states.
Bibliography:
Baker, R. (eds.) Public Administration in Small and
Island
States, West
Hartford, 1992.
Clarke, C. and T. Payne (eds.) Politics, Security, and Development in
Small States, London,
1987.
Randma-Liiv, T. Civil Service Careers in Small and Large States: The
Cases of Estonia and the United Kingdom, „Administrative Organisation,
Tasks of the State, and the Civil Service“ series, vol 47, Baden-Baden:
Nomos, 2001.
Raadschelders, J. B. 1992. Definitions of Smallness: A Comparative
Study. In: R. Baker (ed.). Public Administration in Small and Island
States.
West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press
Benedict, B. 1966. Sociological Characteristics of Small
Territories
and Their Implications for Economic Development. In: M. Banton (ed.).
The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. London: Tavistock Publications.
Sutton, P. and A. Payne. 1993. Lilliput under Threat: the Security
Problems of Small
Island and Enclave
Developing States. Political Studies, XLI.
Baker, R. 1992. Scale and Administrative Performance: The Governance of
Small
States and Microstates.
In: R. Baker (ed.). Public Administration in Small and Island States.
West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Randma-Liiv, T. 2002. Small States
and Bureaucracy: Challenges for Public Administration. Trames,
vol. 6(56/51), no. 4.
Warrington,
E. 1992. Taking Account of Small Scale and Insularity in Administrative
Reform Strategies: The Case of Malta 1988 – 90. In: R. Baker (ed.).
Public Administration in Small and Island States.
West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Sikk, A. 2006. From Private Organizations to Democratic Infrastructure:
Political Parties and the State in Estonia. Journal of Communist
Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 22, No 3.
Sutton, P. 1987. Political Aspects. In: C. Clarke and T. Payne (eds).
Politics, Security and Development in Small States. London: Allen & Unwin.
Thorhallsson, B. 2000. The Administrative Working Procedures of Member
States. In: B. Thorhallsson. The Role of Small States in the European
Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Vital, D. 2006 [1967]. The Inequality of States: A Study of the Small
Power in International Relations. In: Ch. Ingebritsen, I. Neumann, S. Gstöhl and J. Beyer (eds.).
Small States in International Relations. Seattle: University
of Washington Press,
Reykjavik:
University of Iceland Press.
Thorallsson, B. and A. Wivel. 2006. Small States in the European Union:
What Do We Know and What Would We Like to Know? Cambridge Review
of International Affairs, Vol. 19, No. 4.
Hey, J.A.K. 2002. Luxembourg’s Foreign Policy: Does
Small Size Help or Hinder?
Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 3.
Ernst, D and K. Linsu. 2002. Global Production Networks, Knowledge
Diffusion and Local Capability Formation. Research Policy, 31.
Stiglitz, J. 2000. The Insider: What I learned at the World Economic
Crisis. The New Republic, April 17.
Handel, M.I. 1981. Weak States in the International System. London: F. Cass.
Moses, J. 2000. Open States in the Global Economy. The Political
Economy of Small State Macroeconomic Management. Hampshire:
Macmillan.
Andersen E.S. and B-A. Lundvall. Small National Systems of Innovation
Facing Technological Revolutions: An Analytical Framework. In: Freeman,
C. & Lundvall, B. 1988. Small Countries Facing Technological
Revolution. London.
Kattel, R. and R. Anton. 2004. The Estonian Genome Project and Economic
Development. Trames. 8(58/53), 1/2
Lecturer(s): Research fellows Tarmo Kalvet &
Külli Sarapuu & professor
Tiina Randma-Liiv
Educational methods:
The teaching method is a mixture of lectures and student seminar
presentations. Within two weeks eight 2-hour lectures and two 3-hour
seminars are held (all starting at evening times, 5:00 PM). For every lecture students
are delivered with topical reading materials to be worked through
beforehand. During the lectures the key issues of a topic (small state
peculiarities, statehood and public administration, politics and
policy-making, international relations, economic systems) are presented
and discussed. For the seminars students are expected to present cases
orally on the subjects already covered and analyze them by drawing
parallels between theoretical standpoints and empirical findings
(cases). After the course students are expected to present a paper (5-7
pages long essay) on course-related topic (could be a part of a master`s
thesis).
Evaluation method:
Evaluation based on written exam on open questions (70% of a grade) and
writing assignment (30% of a grade)
----------------------------------
The introductory module provides students with:
-
Insight in core literature on the specialisation
-
Current theoretical debates and issues
-
Insight into more specific research methods related to the
specialisation
-
Already carried out studies and empirical findings
-
An overall background to formulate a thesis outline
Schedule of specialisation module courses
The specialisation module courses are held during the first months of
spring term, i.e. in February and March. The sequence of courses and
exact dates vary annually. All courses are scheduled for evening times
starting from 5:00 PM.
Language of instruction
The language of instruction of the whole "Innovation Policy and Small States" specialisation module is English.
Maximum number of ESST students
There are no formal requirements with regard to minimum or maximum
number of students for the specialisation under Technology Governance
programme.
Some examples of thesis topics
-
Fiscal policy, budgeting and planning in small states;
-
The impact of financial policy on innovation process;
-
The risks and benefits of a development strategy based on external
financing;
-
The impact of technology and techno-economic paradigms on small
states (specifically, on education and the university system; on
parliamentary elections and the constitutional framework via e- and
m-voting and e-governance generally; or on mobility of economic
activities (e.g. outsourcing) and company-level strategies);
-
The role of the diversity of economic activities and occupations in
innovation;
-
Small Country ‘Squeeze’: technology and skills gap between large and
small countries;
-
The role and the nature of social capital in small states;
-
Public-private partnership, procurement and innovation;
-
The impact of public sector reform on innovation, R&D and education
policies in small states.
Techno-economic paradigms, financial fragility and development, the
characteristics of CEE countries, e-governance, administration and
innovation, role and impact of structural funds on innovation, the
impact of public procurement on innovation, and economic development and
innovation in small states is general indication of possible topics to
be covered by theses.
Staff members who may act as thesis supervisors
Prof. Rainer Kattel: innovation and development in CEE, national
innovation systems
Prof. Wolfgang Drechsler: the role of public management and the state in
innovation and economic development
Prof. Tiina Randma-Liiv: administration of small states
Prof. Jan Kregel: financial policies, innovation and economic
development
Prof. Carlota Perez: techno-economic paradigms
Prof. Erik S. Reinert: uneven development, preconditions and management
of innovations, relationship between financial and production capital
Research fellow Tarmo Kalvet: ICT, e-governance, innovation policy
Research fellow Veiko Lember: impact of public procurement on innovation
Research fellow Külli Sarapuu: administration of small states
Web
sites
More information regarding Technology Governance programme,
Tallinn University of Technology, and supportive services for
international students may be obtained from the following websites:
http://hum.ttu.ee/tg/
http://www.ttu.ee/?lang=en
http://www.campusttu.ee/eng/
http://www.ip.ttu.ee/
Coordinator of specialisation
Prof. Rainer Kattel
Institute
of Public
Administration
Sütiste tee 21
13419
Tallinn
Estonia
Phone: +372 620 2660
Fax: +372 620 2665
E-mail: kattel@staff.ttu.ee
Egert Juuse (officer in international relations)
Phone: +372 620 2657
Fax: +372 620 2665
E-mail: egert.juuse@ttu.ee
|